05/17/22

Shamanistic Healing with Ayahuasca

Shaman in Ecuadorian Amazonia during a real ayahuasca ceremony, as seen in April 2015; © ammit | 123rf.com

Ayahuasca had (has?) a Hollywood connection. Celebrities like Jim Carrey, Lindsay Lohan, Chelsea Handler and others took the ayahuasca train for reasons as varied as personal enlightenment and telepathic experience. Celebrity interest in ayahuasca dates back to William Burroughs, who said the effects of yage (ayahuasca) were indescribable. “It is the most powerful drug I have ever experienced. That is, it produces the most complete derangement of the senses.”

The above quote is found in “The Yagé Aesthetic of William Burroughs,” the PhD Thesis of Joanna Harrop. She noted how The Yage Letters, published ten years after his own search for ayahuasca, did not include these comments. Perhaps Burroughs telepathically anticipated the actions that would later classify ayahuasca’s psychedelic ingredient, DMT (dimethyltryptamine), as a Schedule I controlled substance and intentionally left out those comments. Harrop noted that in his correspondence Burroughs seems to think of yage was a secret Cold War weapon. He said, “I know the Russians are working on it, and I think U.S. also. Russians are trying to produce ‘automatic obedience,’ have imported vast quantities of Yage for experiments on slave labor.”

While some follow Burroughs in his journey to the South American rainforests in search of their ayahuasca ritual, others simply fly a shaman in to L.A. from the Amazon River region to perform an ayahuasca ceremony. Because DMT is illegal in the U.S. these ceremonies are “invite-only.” You have to be vetted beforehand and show you’re serious about having the experience. In 2015, it was said: “On any given L.A. night, there are 50 to 100 circles being conducted.”

Scientific Studies of Ayahuasca for Healing

Yet there are also scientific studies being done to determine if ayahuasca can treat or heal depression, anxiety, PTSD and alcohol abuse. Scientists are also exploring how DMT alters the user’s waking brain-wave patterns, producing an experience that has been described as “dreaming while awake.” A study published in Scientific Reports by Timmermann et al found that immersion in the DMT state led to marked decreases in the user’s brain-wave patterns. Ars Technica said the subjects were fitted with EEG caps and electrodes to monitor their brain activity while being given an infusion of DMT. “The team found that the DMT caused a marked drop in alpha waves, a mark of wakefulness, along with a corresponding brief increase in theta brain wives, indicative of a dream state.”

These researchers also found there was more chaotic brain activity in subjects who were under the influence of DMT. They speculated this may explain why ayahuasca users report more vivid visual effects and a greater sense of immersion in the psychedelic experience. The lead author of the study, Christopher Timmermann, said: “From the altered brainwaves and participants’ reports, it’s clear these people are completely immersed in their experience—it’s like daydreaming only far more vivid and immersive, it’s like dreaming but with your eyes open.”

Co-author Robin Carhart-Harris said it was hard to capture and communicate what it is like for people experiencing DMT, comparing it to dreaming while awake or near-death experiences. “Our sense is that research with DMT may yield important insights into the relationship between brain activity and consciousness, and this small study is a first step along that road.”

A Brazilian study sought to assess the impact of ceremonial use of ayahuasca on alcohol and tobacco use disorder. Barbosa et al recruited 1,947 members of UDV—Uniã do Vegetal— from 10 states from all the major regions of Brazil. “Current use disorders for alcohol and tobacco were significantly lower in the UDV sample than the Brazilian norms.” This difference was even greater when UDV membership was more than 3 years.

We also found that ayahuasca use variables—ceremonial attendance during the previous 12 months and years of UDV membership—were much stronger predictors of reduced alcohol and tobacco use disorders and use during the previous 12 months than were the SES variables age, gender and level of education.

An another mostly Brazilian study by Palhano-Fontes et al of the therapeutic potential of ayahuasca on depression found evidence of rapid antidepressant effect after a single dose of ayahuasca when compared to placebo. The researchers noted that the severity of depression changed significantly, but differently for the ayahuasca and placebo groups. A review of the study in Mad in America by Hanna Emerson commented how the researchers noted a high placebo rate in their study—46% on day 1 and 26% on day 7. Their hypothesis was that the high placebo response was potentially associated with the ‘care effect,’ the comfortable and supportive environment experienced by participants in the study who were from low socioeconomic populations.

While all of the 29 participants reported feeling safe in the study, some participants reported it was not necessarily a pleasant experience. Some reported the experience was accompanied by a good bit of psychological stress. Most reported experiencing nausea and about 57% vomited. “Although vomiting is traditionally not considered a side effect of ayahuasca, but rather part of the purging process.” All participants were naïve to ayahuasca, with no previous experience with any other psychedelic substance.

The researchers touted their study as the first randomized placebo-controlled trial to investigate the antidepressant potential of a psychedelic with treatment-resistant depression. Because of the unique effects of psychedelics, a major challenge of the research was maintaining double blindness. They thought the additional measures taken in the study, including the use of an active placebo that increased anxiety and induced nausea, adequately preserved blindness in their study. But I wonder if that judgement was just wishful thinking on the part of the researchers. How do you truly double blind something with unique effects?

Uthaug et el concluded the drug was no better than a placebo. In order to understand the role of set and setting on psychological effects observed after participating in an ayahuasca ceremony, a naturalistic, placebo-controlled observational study was done. The researchers hypothesized that set and setting would impact both groups, but the pharmacological effects would only be seen in the ayahuasca group. Set referred to the intentions, mood state and expectations of the individual taking part in an ayahuasca ritual, and setting referred to the context in which the ceremony takes place.

A review of the study on Mad in America by Peter Simons observed that there was no difference between the ayahuasca group and the placebo group on outcome measures of anxiety, depression or stress. This suggested an important role for the set and setting of the ayahuasca ceremony itself. The researchers in Uthaug et al said:

Together, ratings of the psychedelic experience in the present study indicate that participants in both groups experienced altered states of consciousness during the ceremony and that the strength of the mean experience was low, with individual experiences ranging from absent to strong.

Participants in the study had extensive previous experiences with ayahuasca and may have developed personal sets of expectations and intentions. They speculated that repeated participation in ayahuasca ceremonies might stimulate learned associations with enhanced well-being, “which are memorized and experienced even when assigned to a placebo group.”

The present study primarily focused on the general impact of set and setting per se. In this context, it should also be noted that for many indigenous traditions, it is not necessary for the participants to consume ayahuasca. The belief held is that the shamans perform their work to aid those in the ceremony, even if they have not consumed the brew. [emphasis added]

The Shamanic Origins of Ayahuasca

Evidence of ayahuasca use can be dated back 1,000 years. In the 16th century, missionaries from Spain first encountered indigenous people using ayahuasca in the western Amazonian basin. Their earliest reports described it as “the work of the devil.” Its transition from an indigenous South American healing ritual, to fashionable Hollywood “circles” and a potential treatment for various mental health conditions was facilitated by William Burroughs, his book The Yage Letters, a Chilean psychiatrist and the Esalen Institute.

When he was travelling through South America, Burroughs read a paper by an American ethnobiologist, Richard Evan Schultes, who is known for his studies of the use of plants, especially hallucinogenic plants, found in Mexico and the Amazon. Burroughs then sought ayahuasca in hopes that it could cure or relieve his opiate addiction.  It did not cure his addiction to opiates, but it did lead to the publication of The Yage Letters.

A Chilean psychiatrist and self-proclaimed shaman named Claudio Naranjo convinced Schultes to permit him to travel up the Amazon with him in order to study ayahuasca with indigenous tribes. Naranjo brought back samples and eventually published the first scientific description of the effects of ayahuasca in 1967. In the U.S., he became a close friend of Carlos Castaneda (author of The Teachings of Don Juan), and worked with Fritz Perls, the originator of Gestalt therapy, as part of the early Esalen Institute community. He returned to Chile and began research into psychopharmacology. Afterwards he wrote The Healing Journey, originally published in 1973. Naranjo dedicated this book was to Franz Hoffman, “who sponsored my career as research psychiatrist in psychopharmacology and shamanism.”

Stanislav Grof, a well-known name in the psychedelic community, wrote the Foreword to The Healing Journey. In 1970 he presciently said that with the increasing knowledge of the nature and emotional dynamics of psychosomatic disorders, it became obvious there would be no overnight cure in the form of a new miraculous antidepressant agent. But he thought two independent streams seemed to have promise—the use of chemical agents with psychotherapy and the development of “new experimental psychotherapeutic techniques.”

Claudio Naranjo is an outstanding representative of both of these streams, and his synthesis of drug-assisted psychotherapy and the new experimental techniques seems to offer an interesting approach to the problem of brief therapy. . .  [His] experience with psychoactive substances is even more impressive than his work with new psychotherapeutic techniques. Over the years, he has experiments with more than thirty compounds—mostly psychedelics and amphetamine derivatives—as adjuncts to psychotherapy. He made a special canoe journey up the Amazon River to connect with South American Indians and study their use of ayahuasca or yage.

Naranjo is the embodiment of the shaman-psychiatrist, combining psychedelics with psychotherapy to promote his sense of healing. His last talk, given six weeks before his death in 2019 was titled “The relevance of ayahuasca in the problems of the world.” After an extended discussion of civilized culture, original sin, and the patriarchal order, he turned to ayahuasca. He then described some of his experiments in Chile.

There was group of people who were naïve to the culture of indigenous peoples, who didn’t know what they were taking. They would start seeing birds and snakes and other “typical indigenous images of ayahuasca, which are depicted in the ceramics of the South American peoples.” He convinced himself this was something like what Carl Jung called the archetypical world. He thought the most striking phenomenon in ayahuasca was not the appearance of the animal aspect, the personification of the primitive. “What’s striking about ayahuasca is a change of attitude toward the animal.”

We have transformed some animals into terrible animals, but clearly the terrible is a part within ourselves. But there is the potential of recognizing another type of animality that is sometimes called a power animal or a sacred animal. I don’t think that this is a strange phenomenon of ayahuasca, because one of the pillars of psychotherapy was the Freudian ambition of decriminalized instincts. It’s not usually achieved. Other things are much more easily achieved. The depth of the original sin leaves a really deep imprint in us. So we feel bad because we carry a life of instincts. So it’s quite rare to have this phenomenon, which we sometimes easily see in ayahuasca. One of my first voluntary subjects, a woman, came across a Siberian tiger, a white tiger, and the tiger then became her guide. She’s now older, she’s my age, and she still feels that the tiger is her spiritual guide.

We are at a time when mental health professionals are being challenged to seriously investigate the supposed scientific potential of various psychedelics like ayahuasca, MDMA and psilocybin for conjoint use with psychotherapy. We should also become aware of the long association of psychedelics with shamanistic healing rituals and the clearly unscientific explanations of their power. Is the discussion of dramatic healings with ayahuasca and other psychedelics just a description of a shamanistic healing ritual couched in scientific rhetoric? While further study is needed, it seems to me that the placebo effect of the ceremony, not the psychedelic compound itself, is the significant factor in reported therapeutic changes with ayahuasca.

For more information on Claudio Naranjo, see “Is the Enneagram Spiritually Neutral? Part 2 and Part 3.

09/28/21

Is the Enneagram Spiritually Neutral? Part 2

© peterhermesfurian | 123rf.com

The Enneagram of personality was developed by two men, Oscar Ichazo and Claudio Naranjo. In “The Enneagram — A History (Part 3),” Brandon Medina said Ichazo and Naranjo each played a key role in reimagining the Enneagram. As a result, the modern Enneagram, the Enneagram of personality, is not being taught and practiced the way George Gurdjieff conceived it, “as a tool which can reveal all knowledge and by which the secrets of the cosmos are laid bare.” Medina suggested that you could say that the Enneagram created by Gurdjieff died with him.

In Part 1, we looked at some of the history behind the Enneagram, noting how Gurdjieff drew it from ancient sources, possibly from the Babylonians. The Law of Three and the Law of Seven in the Enneagram were noted to be the philosophical foundation of the Fourth Way, a method he developed for humans to switch from the temporal to the immortal—in order to experience the “real world.” Here, while looking at “The Enneagram—A History (Part 2),” we will see how the efforts of two men transformed the Enneagram into a mystical personality test.

Ichazo and His Scientific “Discovery”

Oscar Ichazo was born in Bolivia in 1931. At the age of nineteen he joined a study group that experimented with techniques of altered consciousness. “I had contact with Indians and they introduced me to psychedelic drugs and shamanism while I was in my early teens.” Roughly one year later he was introduced to the writings of both George Gurdjieff and P.D. Ouspensky, a student of Gurdjieff. Ichazo said in 1950 he was invited to a closed study group that included Theosophists, esoteric Rosicrucians, and a sect of mystical Christians called Martinists, where he took part in long discussions about the work of Gurdjieff and Ouspensky. “I first pointed out to this group that all the ideas proposed by Gurdjieff and Ouspensky could be traced to certain forms of Gnosticism and to specific doctrines of the Stoics, the Epicurians, and the Manichaeans.”

Ichazo began to research Eastern tantra and the Holy Kabbalah. He traveled to Tibet and India to study yoga, alchemy, I Ching Kabbalah, Buddhism, Zen and Sufism. “Ichazo claimed to have received insight and instruction from Metatron the prince of the archangels and students whom Ichazo trained at his Arica Institute were guided by their own spirit guide, the Green Qu ’Tab, once they reach a higher state of development.” After waking from “a divine coma” he was in for seven days, he realized he had been entrusted to bring a special new accelerated method of spiritual work to the West.

The Enneagram with Riso-Hudson Type Names

Most Enneagram practitioners attribute the nine personality categories and their corresponding numbers on the Enneagram figure to Ichazo. He said the Enneagram of personality came to him in a vision and was his sole invention. He also introduced several other Enneagrams, which he called enneagons, for a total of one hundred and eight. The only differences were the terms surrounding the Enneagram figure, not the figure itself. He claimed direct revelation of all 108 Enneagram types.

I never considered them my invention, but a discovery as scientific discoveries are, with exactly the same qualifications of being verifiable and objective. . . [They] reflect something real in human nature itself. We feel the categories have been discovered rather than invented.

He later modified this statement, saying he did not receive the enneagons from anyone. “They came to me, 108 in all, as in a vision, showing their internal relationships with complete clarity.” Ichazo said that not only was he the initiator of the Enneagram of personality, but also “the 108 enneagons and the entire system in all its terms have been developed by me, only and exclusively.” He began teaching a group of fifty-five students in Arica who sought to reach their human potential (striving to switch from the temporal to the immortal—in order to experience the “real world”) by listening to a series of his lectures and using a variety of spiritual practices based on mystical and meditative traditions.

Naranjo and What Came to Him

Claudio Naranjo was a Chliean psychiatrist born in 1932. He was also introduced to the Enneagram and Ouspensky in his teens. In 1962, Naranjo was at Harvard as a visiting Fulbright scholar, where he participated in Gordon Alport’s Social Psychology seminar. He became a close friend of Carlos Castaneda and was part of Leo Zeff’s psychedelic therapy group in 1965-66. While taking a pilgrimage after the death of his son, Naranjo returned to Chile and became a student of Ichazo’s at the Arica Institute.

Naranjo corroborated Ichazo’s claim about how he received the enneagons. He said it was his own reading of Ouspensky and the Fourth Way that led him to Ichazo. “My main interest in learning from Oscar Ichazo was a conviction that he was a link to the Sarmouni—the school behind Gurdjieff.” But like Ichazo, Naranjo muddied the water as to the origin of the Enneagram of personality, initially saying it was Ichazo who introduced him to the Enneagram during Ichazo’s series of lectures.

Later, he seemed to suggest Ichazo cared very little for the Enneagram. Referring to Ichazo, Naranjo said, “He didn’t talk about the enneagrams of personality more than two hours during our year with him.” Naranjo said if Ichazo was credited as the ‘seed’ of the enneagram movement, “I should rather compare myself to the gardener who has watered the plant.” He claimed it was he, Naranjo, who put into words what Ichazo had the barest understanding and description of. Naranjo has also stated the psychological types of the Enneagram came to him by a process of ‘automatic writing.’

Naranjo sites his ‘automatic’ writing while Ichazo has said that a person “may receive instructions from the higher entities such as Metatron, the prince of the archangels, who has given instructions to Ichazo.” It was the contradictory claims of origin between the two and specifically the supernatural claims of inspiration made by both men which would later become a problem regarding ownership for Ichazo, Naranjo, and Arica.

Naranjo brought the Enneagram of personality to the Esalen Institute in Big Sur, California. Esalen was an experimental center of esoteric ideas that had a crucial role in the human potential movement. Naranjo’s connection to Esalen was through his being an apprentice of Fritz Perls, and part of the early Gestalt Therapy movement, where he conducted workshops as a visiting associate at Esalen. One of Naranjo’s students at Esalen was a Jesuit priest, Bob Ochs, who took what he had learned about the Enneagram of personality to Loyola University in 1971.

The Enneagram Goes to Church

There Ochs taught the Enneagram of personality to several priests, including Don Riso, Mitch Pawca and Gerry Hare, who later taught it to Richard Rohr. In time, Don Riso left the priesthood and cofounded The Enneagram Institute with Russ Hudson. Pawca eventually abandoned the Enneagram, concerned it was introducing New Age beliefs into Catholicism. He wrote Catholics and the New Age in 1992 and “Enneagram: A Modern Myth.” Within the chapter, “Occult Roots of the Enneagram,” Pawca said:

The books by Gurdjieff’s disciples and articles about Oscar Ichazo prove they practiced occultism and that occultism is interwoven with the enneagram itself. Therefore, I believe Christians need to be aware of the enneagram’s occult origins so they can prevent occult traces from infecting their faith in Christ Jesus.

Lastly, there is Richard Rohr, who would become one of the key figures to popularize the Enneagram of personality within evangelical churches. He is a Franciscan priest who founded the Center for Action and Contemplation in Albuquerque, New Mexico. He’s published over thirty books, including: The Enneagram: A Christian Perspective and Discovering the Enneagram: An Ancient Tool a New Spiritual Journey. He wrote the Foreword to The Sacred Enneagram by Christopher Heuertz. Ian Cron and Susan Stabile, co-authors of The Road Back To You, along with Heuertz are friends and students of Rohr. The Sacred Enneagram and The Road Back to You are two of the most popular and widely read books on the Enneagram of personality within evangelical churches.

Medina noted how the competing claims of the supernatural origin of what they taught led to problems regarding ownership of the Enneagram of personality for Ichazo, Naranjo and Arica. The origins debate only became worse as students of both Ichazo and Naranjo disregarded non-disclosure agreements they signed and began to teach and write about what they had been taught. “In an attempt to stem the tide Naranjo went so far as to say that if these techniques were used or published outside of his training they would lessen in effect.” Yet, Naranjo failed to make those attending his public meetings sign a nondisclosure.

Much like what happened with Ichazo and Naranjo, attributions of conflicting origins were made by the various authors. Riso claimed a contemporary originship of Ichazo and Naranjo and not an ancient one as was claimed by Gurdjieff only to later change his position; Speeth and Palmer claimed an ancient origin which was developed by Gurdjieff and the Sufis. Though Palmer does agree with Ichazo’s claim that he developed a “new tradition” apart from the context [of] Sufi, Christian, and Gurdjieff into “an eclectic new age spiritual growth context.” No one can seem to agree if it is new or ancient, or new but ancient, or ancient but new. Because of the violation of the non-disclosure agreement as mentioned above, Arica would bring a lawsuit claiming copyright infringement; and in an ironic and amusing turn of events the very people whom broke the non-disclosure agreement they signed with Arica later made their students also sign non-disclosure agreements which they summarily ignored and broke. The books which quickly followed began to remove Arica, Ichazo, and Naranjo as originators of the Enneagram while some sought to ‘Christianize’ it.

There are now over 30 books by Christian publishers on the Enneagram of personality. IVP, InterVarsity Press, has books by Suzanne Stabile, Alice Fryling, Sean Palmer, and others. Zondervan publishes works by Christopher Heurtz. Thomas Nelson publishes Enneagram books by Beth McCord and Matthew Stephen Brown. There are dozens of Christian Enneagram coaches, like Beth McCord, the founder of YEC (Your Enneagram Coach), who provide “courses, coaching and community to help you discover your best self, using the tool of the Enneagram through the lens of the Gospel.”

Is the Enneagram of personality a ‘tool’ Christians can use? According to Beth McCord, you can see yourself “with astonishing clarity with the Enneagram through the lens of the Gospel, so [you] can break free from self-condemnation, fear, and shame by knowing and experiencing the unconditional love, forgiveness, and freedom in Christ.” We’ll examine this claim in the light of Scripture and look at a biblical critique of the Enneagram and the Enneagram of personality in Part 3 of this article.